Max’s Salem’s Lot Review: The New Adaptation Squeezes Stephen King’s Story But Is Sustained By Its Characters And Scares
Film

Max’s Salem’s Lot Review: The New Adaptation Squeezes Stephen King’s Story But Is Sustained By Its Characters And Scares



When Stephen King novels get adapted as feature films, the name of the game is always compression. Even the longest of the long King movies (Frank Darabont’s 189 minute adaptation of The Green Mile and Mike Flanagan’s 180 minute director’s cut of Doctor Sleep) feature composite characters and skip over subplots from their source material. As cinematic as the books are, this is a reflection of the author’s style: his fiction creates not just lives but worlds.

The way in which many filmmakers have circumvented this obstacle in the past is by not adapting the books as features but instead as miniseries, and Salem’s Lot is a prime example. The novel (which is the second King had published) is not one of the writer’s longest tomes, but it has twice found a more comfortable home with the expanded real estate available on the small screen – first in director Tobe Hooper’s adaptation from 1979 and then again in 2004 with director Mikael Salomon at the helm. A standout part of the experience of the book is witnessing the creeping vampire infestation engulf the abbreviated titular town, and unfolding as a two-part series on television allowed that.



Original Source